Fixed many minor things, tested it on main and is amazing, i think i need to start adding fractions next so further testing can be done with more powerful operators
This commit is contained in:
12
src/parser.c
12
src/parser.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ uint8_t node_lbp(ASTNode node) {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case OP_DIV:
|
||||
case OP_MUL:
|
||||
return 30;
|
||||
return 20;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -31,11 +31,13 @@ uint8_t node_rbp(ASTNode node) {
|
||||
switch (node.data.binary.op) {
|
||||
case OP_ADD:
|
||||
case OP_SUB:
|
||||
return 20;
|
||||
return 11;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case OP_DIV:
|
||||
case OP_MUL:
|
||||
return 40;
|
||||
return 21;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -51,7 +53,7 @@ bool ASTNodeSlice_is_valid(ASTNodeSlice *slice) {
|
||||
if (slice->arr->len < 1) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (slice->pos >= slice->arr->len - 1) {
|
||||
if (slice->pos >= slice->arr->len) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -78,7 +80,7 @@ ASTNode *parse_expr(ASTNodeSlice *slice, uint8_t min_bp) {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ASTNode operator = operator = ASTNodeSlice_peek(slice);
|
||||
ASTNode operator = ASTNodeSlice_peek(slice);
|
||||
uint8_t rbp = node_rbp(operator);
|
||||
uint8_t lbp = node_lbp(operator);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user